Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Diabet Med ; 39(4): e14755, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1550817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid implementation of remote care delivery in type 1 diabetes. We studied current modes of care delivery, healthcare professional experiences and impact on insulin pump training in type 1 diabetes care in the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: The UK Diabetes Technology Network designed a 48-question survey aimed at healthcare professionals providing care in type 1 diabetes. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three healthcare professionals (48% diabetes physicians, 52% diabetes educators and 88% working in adult services) from approximately 75 UK centres (52% university hospitals, 46% general and community hospitals), responded to the survey. Telephone consultations were the main modality of care delivery. There was a higher reported time taken for video consultations versus telephone (p < 0.001). Common barriers to remote consultations were patient familiarity with technology (72%) and access to patient device data (67%). We assessed the impact on insulin pump training. A reduction in total new pump starts (73%) and renewals (61%) was highlighted. Common barriers included patient digital literacy (61%), limited healthcare professional experience (46%) and time required per patient (44%). When grouped according to size of insulin pump service, pump starts and renewals in larger services were less impacted by the pandemic compared to smaller services. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights UK healthcare professional experiences of remote care delivery. While supportive of virtual care models, a number of factors highlighted, especially patient digital literacy, need to be addressed to improve virtual care delivery and device training.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Health Personnel , Self-Management/education , Telemedicine , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Biomedical Technology/education , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Glycemic Control/instrumentation , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insulin Infusion Systems , Pandemics , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Remote Consultation/methods , Remote Consultation/organization & administration , Self-Management/methods , Self-Management/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiology
2.
Diabet Med ; 38(11): e14665, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1334443

ABSTRACT

To investigate and characterise general and diabetes-specific worries related to COVID-19 among people with diabetes in Denmark during the first 3 months of the pandemic. In a longitudinal study from March to June 2020, six online questionnaires (Q1-Q6) were distributed to 2430 adult members of two diabetes panels. Worries related to COVID-19 were measured with closed- and open-ended items. Data from closed-ended items were analysed descriptively. Open-ended responses were analysed with systematic text condensation. Using chi-squared tests, changes in proportions of worries over time were analysed, and differences in diabetes-specific worries by gender and diabetes diagnosis were explored. At Q1, 1366 individuals returned a response (Q2: 1082, Q3: 992, Q4: 977, Q5: 901, Q6: 816). In the beginning of the pandemic, 2 weeks after the first lockdown in Denmark, the most frequently reported general worries related to someone close becoming seriously ill, changes in daily life such as limitations on social interactions and uncertainty about the duration of those changes. The most frequently reported diabetes-specific worries were about severity of illness with COVID-19 due to diabetes, being identified as a member of a group at risk for COVID-19 and being unable to manage diabetes if ill with COVID-19. All concerns decreased over 3 months, as the society gradually reopened, except for persistent worries about being able to manage diabetes if ill with COVID-19. More women and people with type 1 diabetes reported worries, compared with men and people with type 2 diabetes. Our study highlights the diversity of worries related to the COVID-19 pandemic among people with diabetes and changing patterns of worry over time and across subgroups as the society reopened in Denmark. These insights can be helpful when providing support for people with diabetes during health crises.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Self-Management/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Denmark , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care ; 47(4): 290-301, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1329105

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this substudy was to determine the most acceptable way to restart the Texas Strength Through Resilience in Diabetes Education (TX STRIDE) study safely using remote technologies. Following the emergence of COVID-19, all in-person TX STRIDE intervention and data collection sessions were paused. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methods using telephone interviews were conducted during the research pause. A structured interview guide was developed to facilitate data collection and coding. Forty-seven of 59 Cohort 1 participants were interviewed (mean age = 60.7 years; 79% female; mean time diagnosed with type 2 diabetes = 11 years). RESULTS: Data categories and subcategories were generated from the interview responses and included: personal experiences with COVID-19, effects of COVID-19 on diabetes self-management, psychosocial and financial effects of COVID-19, and recommendations for program restart. Although some participants lacked technological knowledge, they expressed eagerness to learn how to use remote meeting platforms to resume intervention and at-home data-collection sessions. Six months after the in-person intervention was paused, TX STRIDE restarted remotely with data collection and class sessions held via Zoom. A majority of participants (72.9%) transitioned to the virtual platform restart. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative findings guided the appropriate implementation of technology for the study, which facilitated a successful restart. High retention of participants through the study transition provides evidence that participants are invested in learning how to manage their diabetes despite the challenges and distractions imposed by COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , COVID-19 , Culturally Competent Care , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Self-Management , Black or African American/psychology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , COVID-19/ethnology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/ethnology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Self-Management/education , Self-Management/psychology , Texas/epidemiology
4.
BMC Neurol ; 21(1): 284, 2021 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1319459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the effects of COVID-19 social distancing on the function, health, and well-being of people with Parkinson disease (PD), and test the association of these effects with patients' activation levels, i.e., their skills and confidence in managing their health. METHODS: Community-dwelling individuals with PD answered an anonymous web-based survey. Part 1 included 27 multiple-choice questions regarding changes in function, health, medical care, and well-being. Part 2 consisted of the Patient Activation Measure, which enquired about skills and confidence in managing one's health. RESULTS: Respondents (N = 142) reported decreases in various function (24.8%-37.3%), health (33.8%-43%), and well-being (26.1%-47.1%) domains. Rehabilitation ceased for 61.2%. Among those reporting a worsening of health, 67.8% associated this with the cessation of rehabilitative treatments or decrease in physical activity. Patients' activation levels were inversely correlated with increased assistance for activities of daily living, increased tiredness, worsening symptoms, and lack of support from family and friends. CONCLUSIONS: Social distancing had a major negative impact on the health and function of people with PD. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Supporting people with PD skills and confidence in managing health may preserve their physical and mental health during this period of dramatic changes in life's circumstances.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Mental Health , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Physical Distancing , Self-Management/psychology , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise/physiology , Exercise/psychology , Female , Health Behavior/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Self-Management/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
J Nurs Scholarsh ; 53(4): 418-427, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1177437

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, self-management behavior, and blood pressure control are important to cardiovascular event prevention and promotion of quality of life (QOL), but they are underutilized. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a self-efficacy theory-based health information technology intervention implemented through blood control and patient self-management. DESIGN: A clinical randomized waitlist-controlled trial. METHODS: The study was conducted at a medical center in Taipei, Taiwan. A total of 60 subjects were randomly assigned to either the immediate intervention (experimental) group or the waitlist control group. The primary endpoint was systolic blood pressure at 3 months; secondary end points included self-management behavior and QOL. Treatment for the immediate intervention group lasted 3 months, while the waitlist control group received routine care for the first 3 months, at which point they crossed over to the intervention arm and received the same intervention as the experimental group for another 3 months. Both groups were evaluated by questionnaires and physiological measurements at both 3 and 6 months postadmission. The results were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure significantly improved for the intervention group participants at 3 months, when there was also significant improvement in self-management behavior and QOL. There was no significant or appreciable effect of time spent in the waitlist condition, with treatments in the two conditions being similarly effective. CONCLUSION: The use of a theory-based health information technology treatment compared with usual care resulted in a significant improvement in systolic blood pressure, self-management behavior, and QOL in patients with coronary artery disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This treatment would be a useful strategy for clinical care of cardiovascular disease patients, improving their disease self-management. It also may help guide further digital health care strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Medical Informatics/methods , Psychological Theory , Self-Management/psychology , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Self Efficacy , Taiwan , Treatment Outcome , Waiting Lists
7.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(8): 4819-4825, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1064505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We examined the qualitative impact of an online integrative oncology (IO) treatment program, designed in response to the restrictions created by the current COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients undergoing chemotherapy were seen by an integrative physician (IP), together co-designing an IO treatment program of ≥ 6 weekly treatments to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life (QoL). IO practitioners guided patients and their caregivers online in self-treatment with manual/touch, movement, and/or mind-body modalities. Narratives of both patients and IO practitioners were analyzed for systematic coding, identifying barriers and advantages of the online treatment program. RESULTS: Narratives obtained from 30 patients and eight IO-trained practitioners were examined. The patients had undergone 169 online IO sessions with a total of 327 IO interventions during the 3-month study period. Patient narratives included reflections on both non-specific effects (e.g., less of a "sense of isolation") and specific QoL-related outcomes with the online intervention. IO practitioner narratives focused on barriers to providing manual-movement and mind-body modalities, suggesting practical recommendations on how to address specific QoL-related outcomes using the online IO "toolbox." CONCLUSIONS: Effective online IO practitioner-guided treatments are feasible and may induce both specific and non-specific QoL-related effects. Future research needs to explore online IO interventions for additional situations in which access to IO care is limited.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Integrative Oncology , Internet-Based Intervention , Neoplasms , Quality of Life , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Complementary Therapies/methods , Continuity of Patient Care , Female , Humans , Integrative Oncology/methods , Integrative Oncology/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Narration , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2 , Self-Management/methods , Self-Management/psychology
8.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 14(6): 1603-1605, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059527

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People with diabetes have multiple psychosocial issues related to diabetes and its complications and this may be exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We reviewed the psychological adaptative difficulties in people with diabetes especially during natural disasters including the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: There are significant concerns regarding worsening of glycemic control, unavailability of appropriate medicines, inaccessibility to health care or acquiring SARS- CoV-2 infection and subsequent poorer outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although there are some guidance documents for managing diabetes and associated complications during COVID-19 pandemic but very few address the psychological issues in people with diabetes. We discuss the psychological adaptive difficulties and an approach to address the psychosocial concerns in people with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: People with diabetes have significant diabetes distress and psychological adaptive difficulties that is aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic. An integrated multidisciplinary approach is needed to manage the prevailing psychological issues amongst people with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological/physiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Self-Management/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Self-Management/trends
9.
Eur Eat Disord Rev ; 28(6): 826-835, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-995934

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study explores the ways in which the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and associated lockdown measures have affected the lives of adult patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and their carers. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients with AN (n = 21) and carers (n = 28) from the start of UK Government imposed lockdown. Data related directly to the impact of lockdown and COVID-19 were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four broad themes were identified for patients and carers separately. Patients experienced: 1. reduced access to eating disorder (ED) services; 2. disruption to routine and activities in the community; 3. heightened psychological distress and ED symptoms; 4. increased attempts at self-management in recovery. Carer themes included: 1. concern over provision of professional support for patients; 2. increased practical demands placed on carers in lockdown; 3. managing new challenges around patient wellbeing; 4. new opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced access to ED services, loss of routine and heightened anxieties and ED symptoms resulting from COVID-19 and lockdown measures presented challenges for patients and carers. Increased remote support by ED services enabled the continuation of treatment and self-management resources and strategies promoted self-efficacy in both groups.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Caregivers/psychology , Pandemics , Quarantine , Adult , Anorexia Nervosa/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Self-Management/psychology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
10.
Australas Psychiatry ; 29(2): 189-193, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-969644

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 and the consequent public health and social distancing measures significantly impacted on service continuity for mental health patients. This article reports on contingency planning initiative in the Australian public sector. METHODS: Ninety-word care synopses were developed for each patient. These formed the basis for guided conversations between case managers and consultant psychiatrists to ensure safe service provision and retain a person-centred focus amidst the threat of major staffing shortfalls. RESULTS: This process identified vulnerable patient groups with specific communication needs and those most at risk through service contraction. The challenges and opportunities for promoting safety and self-management through proactive telehealth came up repeatedly. The guided conversations also raised awareness of the shared experience between patients and professionals of coronavirus disease 2019. CONCLUSION: There is a parallel pandemic of anxiety which creates a unique opportunity to connect at a human level.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services , Patient Care Planning , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Telemedicine/methods , Australia , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Patient Safety , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Professional-Patient Relations , Self-Management/methods , Self-Management/psychology , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Triage/methods , Triage/organization & administration
11.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 15(1): 63-68, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-957018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected people's lives including patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on psychological status, self-management behaviors, and diabetes care maintenance among Saudi adults with T1DM using insulin pump therapy. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a web survey to collect data on Saudi adults with T1DM who were treated in the specialized insulin pump clinic at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and General Anxiety Disorder-7 scales to measure depression and anxiety. RESULTS: Of the 70 patients who received the survey, 65 completed it. Overall, 23.1% and 29.2% of the patients reported moderate to severe and mild depression, respectively; 18.5% and 24.6% reported moderate to severe and mild anxiety, respectively. Compared with pre-lockdown, adherence to a healthy diet and regular physical activity decreased in 67.7% and 41.5% of the patients, respectively. Most patients maintained their adherence to insulin pump behaviors; frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose increased in 47% of glucometer users. Most patients benefited from phone visits or virtual education sessions, but 66.2% of the patients reported difficulty obtaining at least one type of insulin pump supply. CONCLUSIONS: Promoting self-management behaviors and psychological wellbeing of patients with T1DM using insulin pump therapy is crucial during a lockdown. Telemedicine is a useful alternative to in-person appointments, but strategies to ensure that patients have access to adequate resources during lockdown must be developed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Insulin Infusion Systems , Quarantine/methods , Self-Management/methods , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Female , Humans , Insulin Infusion Systems/psychology , Male , Quarantine/psychology , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Self-Management/psychology , Telemedicine/methods
12.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 24(21): 11402-11408, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-937847

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to explore the best follow-up management strategy for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) during the novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) epidemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing PD who were followed up during the NCP epidemic by our hospital were enrolled in this study. Because of the need to control the epidemic, a follow-up system was established during the epidemic period, with WeChat, QQ, and the telephone as the main methods of communication. Outpatient and emergency follow-ups were carried out to ensure the safety of dialysis and the prevention and control of the epidemic. The follow-up strategy included response measures related to the epidemic situation, prevention of peritonitis related to PD, water and salt control, exercise guidance, and psychological care. According to the patient's condition, the appointment system was implemented, with one consulting room and one process for each patient. The emergency patients were isolated in accordance with the epidemic situation. RESULTS: Since January 2020, among the 580 patients undergoing PD who were followed up in our department and their families, none had NCP infection. During the epidemic period, the standard hemoglobin level and the inpatient rate decreased. Complications related to PD, such as peritonitis, cardiovascular complications caused by volume overload, and pulmonary infection, did not significantly increase, and the withdrawal rate and mortality rate decreased compared with those in the same period last year. CONCLUSIONS: The patient follow-up strategy during the epidemic period had a significant positive effect on preventing and controlling the epidemic. Furthermore, during the epidemic period, encouraging patients and caregivers to pay attention to protection at home, avoid going out, strengthen self-management, and other measures were beneficial to the control of kidney disease itself, which is worth promoting. The close relationship between doctors and patients during the epidemic had a positive effect on the occurrence of complications related to patients undergoing PD.


Subject(s)
Aftercare/methods , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Hemodialysis, Home/standards , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Peritoneal Dialysis/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Aftercare/standards , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Caregivers/psychology , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Follow-Up Studies , Hemodialysis, Home/adverse effects , Hemodialysis, Home/psychology , Humans , Patient Education as Topic , Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects , Peritoneal Dialysis/psychology , Peritonitis/epidemiology , Peritonitis/etiology , Physician-Patient Relations , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Referral and Consultation/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Self-Management/psychology , Telemedicine/standards , Treatment Outcome
14.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 15: 2127-2133, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-802252

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an important, evidence-based treatment that improves outcomes for people with COPD. Individualized exercise programmes aim to improve exercise capacity; self-management education and psychological support are also provided. Translating increased exercise capacity into sustained behavioural change of increased physical activity is difficult. Other unresolved problems with PR programmes include improving uptake, completion, response and sustaining long-term benefit. We offer a different perspective drawn from clinical experience of PR, quantitative and qualitative studies of singing groups for people with COPD, and stroke rehabilitation research that gives psychological factors a more central role in determining outcomes after PR. We discuss Take Charge; a simple but effective psychological intervention promoting self-management--that could be used as part of a PR programme or in situations where PR was declined or unavailable. This may be particularly relevant now when traditional face-to-face group programmes have been disrupted by COVID-19 precautions.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control , Coronavirus Infections , Exercise Therapy , Health Behavior , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Rehabilitation Research , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy/methods , Exercise Therapy/organization & administration , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Psychosocial Support Systems , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/psychology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Research Design , SARS-CoV-2 , Self-Management/methods , Self-Management/psychology , Treatment Outcome
15.
BMJ Open ; 10(9): e040951, 2020 09 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-760257

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the experience of people with long-term respiratory conditions regarding the impact of measures to reduce risk of COVID-19. DESIGN: Analysis of data (n=9515) from the Asthma UK and British Lung Foundation partnership COVID-19 survey collected online between 1 and 8 April 2020. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: 9515 people with self-reported long-term respiratory conditions. 81% female, age ranges from ≤17 years to 80 years and above, from all nations of the UK. Long-term respiratory conditions reported included asthma (83%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10%), bronchiectasis (4%), interstitial lung disease (2%) and 'other' (<1%) (eg, lung cancer and pulmonary endometriosis). OUTCOME MEASURES: Study responses related to impacts on key elements of healthcare, as well as practical, psychological and social consequences related to the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing measures. RESULTS: 45% reported disruptions to care, including cancellations of appointments, investigations, pulmonary rehabilitation, treatment and monitoring. Other practical impacts such as difficulty accessing healthcare services for other issues and getting basic necessities such as food were also common. 36% did not use online prescriptions, and 54% had not accessed online inhaler technique videos. Psychosocial impacts including anxiety, loneliness and concerns about personal health and family were prevalent. 81% reported engaging in physical activity. Among the 11% who were smokers, 48% reported they were planning to quit smoking because of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 and related social distancing measures are having profound impacts on people with chronic respiratory conditions. Urgent adaptation and signposting of services is required to mitigate the negative health consequences of the COVID-19 response for this group.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Exercise , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Public Health , Respiratory Tract Diseases , Self-Management , Social Isolation/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise/physiology , Exercise/psychology , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Loneliness/psychology , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Public Health/methods , Public Health/standards , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Diseases/physiopathology , Respiratory Tract Diseases/psychology , Risk Reduction Behavior , SARS-CoV-2 , Self-Management/methods , Self-Management/psychology , Self-Management/trends , United Kingdom
17.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 173: 108343, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-664333

ABSTRACT

During the unprecedented times of the COVID 19 pandemic, the lives of people with diabetes have been severely impacted. This article discusses the extent of this impact presenting the obstacles and challenges from the perspective of the patient, including specifics of practical day-to-day diabetes self-management routines. Since the COVID19 outbreak, certain psychosocial factors have been amplifieddue tothe manner in whichmainstream media and policy makers have carelessly emphasized the vulnerability of people with diabetes. The authors discuss the increased importance of support networksdue to people living in isolation and quarantine. Anewlayer of complexity has been added to the already difficult task of managing one's diabetes and ithasincreasedanxiety and stress levels. Guidelines and tips for people living with diabetes are discussed based on theauthors' personalexperiences as well as those ofthe diabetes associations they work with.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Pandemics , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Diabetes Complications/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Humans , Perception/physiology , Psychosocial Support Systems , Quality of Life , Quarantine , Risk Reduction Behavior , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Self-Management/methods , Self-Management/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL